The ETIP
2014 Conference is focusing on immediate and short-term impact!
Last
year
at ETIP we reviewed the relationship
between spirituality and health, noting the research that demonstrates these
are closely linked. We then delved into the possibility that spiritual care
can physiologically benefit patients or clients.
We started the conference by looking at key physiological
mechanisms – asking and answering the question, “What is it that underlies the
connection between spirituality and health?” We discovered the underlying
mechanisms are probably related to the pathways by which stress and trauma
contribute to disease, which may then be interrupted by spiritual care. While
stress is an important part of living, stress is not healthy for us over
extended periods – no surprise – which we refer to as chronic stress. Chronic
stress is well known to have deleterious effects on our immune system that
contribute to the development of diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease,
sometimes autoimmune disease, etc. and it exacerbates many other diseases as
well. This may be even truer for intense stress and emotionally traumatic
experiences.
We learned that this relationship affects our
health not only directly but also indirectly. Chronic stress and
trauma introduce an epigenetic effect (involving a change in DNA function that
occurs after conception). Apparently, the mechanism involves the influence of chronic
stress and trauma as it contributes to methylation of DNA in the stress
response center of our brain. This means that molecules called methyl groups
affix to the cell’s DNA, which then alters people’s stress reactivity, i.e., people
become more sensitive to stress. This can result in behavioral changes and a
different behavioral trajectory than would otherwise have occurred. Essentially,
people become more stress reactive when they’ve been through considerable
trauma or experienced chronic stress that has caused DNA methylation in the
stress center of their brain. Becoming more stress reactive, in turn, has some
predictable influences on our behavior.
First, it triggers aversion responses in us. Hence,
as soon as we feel stressed about something, we have a tendency to want to
avoid it. That means, for example, if we feel stressed about our diet, then we
avoid making changes that would improve our diet; if we feel stressed about our
weight, we avoid addressing the changes that would reduce it; likewise, if we
feel stressed about any of the healthy behaviors that might be pointed out to
us, it can trigger an aversion response. Understandably, it’s harder for people
who experience aversion responses to engage in healthy behaviors. It can be
hard for them to develop personal discipline or make life changes in any area
that triggers a stress response.
Second but closely related, the DNA methylation
that causes stress reactivity is also likely to generate impulsive behaviors. In
people who experience chronic stress or trauma these behaviors are companions to
aversion responses. Rather than endure the anxiety and associated discomfort of
a stress reactive response that’s triggered, for example, by addressing the
need to develop personal discipline including healthy behaviors, people instead
may tend to act out impulsively. They don’t want to pay attention to whether
they’re drinking too much or eating right or driving too fast, or perhaps even
whether they’re wearing a seatbelt. Thinking about these things can all trigger
aversion responses that seek to avoid changing behavior; instead people are prone
to act impulsively and engage in high risk behaviors. Hence, people who become
stress reactive are more likely to smoke, more likely to drink in excess, more
likely to do drugs, more likely to have unwanted pregnancies, more likely to
become involved in criminal behavior, etc. These impulsive behaviors, resulting
from aversion responses, indirectly affect people’s health.
To sum it up, there is a direct and an
indirect correlation between chronic stress and trauma, and disease. The direct
response is cumulatively physiological and it results, as noted, in high blood
pressure, etc., dysregulated immune function and inflammatory response that, as
we also noted, causes cancer and heart disease, and makes other diseases worse.
The indirect response, in comparison, is the effect on behavior, making a
person less likely to develop consistent healthy behaviors and more prone to
engaging in high risk behaviors, resulting in poor health outcomes or
accidental injuries.
That is how we started the conference discussion
last year. Then, we looked at how spirituality contributes to an opposite set
of circumstances. Spirituality, for example, produces a relaxation response
instead of a stress response. The relaxation response is correlated with lower
blood pressure, etc., a regulated immune system, with higher probability of
healthy behaviors, and a longer healthier life. We also learned that spiritual
care may potentially be designed to interrupt the stress response, and we
formed our work groups around developing tools that help clinicians identify
the indications of stress reactivity in their patients and clients – especially
as it may be related to chronic stress and trauma – and then in conversation
with their clients and patients, to review the trajectory of how the stress
response affects the person over their lifetime. That includes, first,
recognizing the indicators that stress reactivity is contributing to poor
health and then, second, interacting with the patient or client in a manner
that involves listening to their story and identifying the elements that are predisposing
health risk. Perhaps there was a major trauma(s) experienced in childhood, for
example, that started the stress reactive trajectory, then aversion responses
and impulsive behaviors contributed to poor health outcomes ever since.
The
spiritual care element comes into play in listening to the stories – non-judgmentally
acknowledging each patient/client’s personal history, helping the person gain
insight into - and acceptance for - what is really happening, and then guiding development
of a strategy for interrupting the unhealthy trajectory with a relaxation
response. A wide variety of spiritual care tools may be seen as aiding this
process.
Last year we only began the conversation
about what clinicians and caregivers can do, when armed with this
understanding, to help their patients or clients. This year, we’re focusing on
what clinicians can do in the short term to produce immediate
benefit. Of course, we’re going to review what it is needed to recognize the
stress-reactive pattern in our patients and clients, to identify the trajectory
from its source through various life experiences and in its current
manifestation in poor health or mental health outcomes, as well as the
importance of encouraging them in telling their story, and all the while
acknowledging the legitimacy of the physical and emotional toll they have
experienced.
This
year,
however, we’re focusing on developing strategies for interrupting the
stress response in an acute care situation. As a group, we will learn how caregivers
can employ spiritual care to interrupt the stress response for immediate
benefit; also, how we can help patients or clients understand how to interrupt the
response; and, how they can transition from a stress response to a relaxation
response. Interestingly, this is something that can actually happen in a few
seconds, physiologically. Yet, it often doesn’t happen at all, or to a very
limited degree, for people who are stuck in a stress reactive pattern. However,
once patients learn that the stress response can be interrupted, and how to
interrupt it, the physiological shift from producing stress hormones to
producing relaxation hormones can happen very quickly. This shift can immediately,
though transiently, produce health and wellness benefit for the patient in the
short term, which may then help them get through a tough situation.
Of course, this doesn’t “fix” the patient or
client. The patient still has a stress reactive life trajectory that is going
to be heavily influenced by the epigenetic methylation of DNA in the stress
response center of their brain. This condition is very likely to continue
triggering aversion responses, including avoidance and impulsive behaviors that
can feed the development of future chronic stressors with a corresponding
elevation of inflammatory mediators, dysregulated immune responses, etc.
However, the patient or client and the caregiver, working together, have the
potential to interrupt that pattern in an acute care situation/environment,
such as may occur around a hospitalization or other short-term caregiving
event. Moreover, we can teach the patient to interrupt it as well (our
intention for next year’s ETIP conference is to explore long-term applications).
This year at the ETIP Conference doctors and
nurses, chaplains, social workers therapists and clergy, etc. will develop
strategies and techniques that interrupt the stress response for distinctly
identified populations of patients or clients. And, they will learn to teach
these strategies to the patients or clients as well. Conference participants
will also learn to recognize the kind of acute care context where these
interventions have immediate impact and produce immediate benefit as a short-term
strategy to help patients and clients through a potentially difficult
experience.
Each of this year’s speakers will contribute
to this discussion. They have been specifically selected for that purpose. Conference
participants will want to note the topic theme for each day and the title of each
presentation as well as review the background of each presenter to see how each
day and each presentation fits together in support of the week’s overall
objectives. This detailed information can be found on the ETIP website at: